Objective 1.1: Maintain High-Quality Courses

Methods of Assessment
The program used the Quality Improvement Plan (QIP), hands-on learning activities, and faculty evaluations to ensure course quality.

Current Evaluation of Results
The QIP was maintained and applied in AY 2024–2025. Curriculum updates included the reinstatement of two courses (CMGT 2320 and CMGT 4320) and the replacement of CMGT 4100 with CMGT 3315 Summer Internship, which increased from one to three credits to provide earlier and more flexible internship opportunities. Hands-on labs were successfully conducted across required courses, and site visits gave students exposure to real-world projects. All full-time and adjunct faculty met teaching targets.

Previous Year Summary
Earlier years emphasized consistent QIP application without major curriculum changes. AY 2024–2025 marked the first set of curriculum adjustments since the QIP update.

Corrective Actions Taken
Curriculum revisions strengthened student internship opportunities and reinstated important courses. Faculty availability was reinforced through a new office hours policy, and adjunct faculty received training on Blackboard.

Follow-up on Impact
These changes expanded experiential learning opportunities, ensured faculty accessibility, and improved teaching delivery through technology training.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None

Objective 1.2: Engage Industry Partners and Alumni

Methods of Assessment
Industry and alumni involvement was assessed through CMAC activities, career fairs, guest speakers, industry-sponsored events, and employer and student surveys.

Current Evaluation of Results
The program conducted Fall and Spring CMAC meetings and maintained alumni support for orientations. Over half of CMAC companies hired students for part-time and internship positions. Industry practitioners served as guest speakers and capstone judges. The Career Fair hosted 22 companies, and the CMSA engaged in AGC and professional events. Employer surveys indicated strong performance in technical and professional skills, w...

Previous Year Summary
The program has consistently strengthened industry ties over prior years. AY 2024–2025 continued this trajectory with expanded student-industry interactions.

Corrective Actions Taken
The program continued structured involvement of practitioners in coursework and events. Faculty and alumni worked closely to support career development.

Follow-up on Impact
Students benefited from career exposure, networking, and employment opportunities. Feedback highlighted areas for ongoing instructional reinforcement.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None

Objective 2.1: Maintain the ACCE Accreditation

Methods of Assessment
Accreditation compliance was tracked through annual SLO evaluations and responses to ACCE concerns.

Current Evaluation of Results
The program sustained compliance by completing annual evaluations of SLOs and addressing concerns related to facilities. Continued progress on lab facility improvements was emphasized.

Previous Year Summary
Accreditation status was consistently maintained in prior years, with ongoing attention to ACCE concerns.

Corrective Actions Taken
Efforts focused on addressing ACCE feedback, particularly on lab facility needs.

Follow-up on Impact
Accreditation standing remained strong, supported by continuous evaluation and improvement.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None

Objective 2.2: Increase Scholarship Availability

Methods of Assessment
Annual tracking of scholarships, internal awards, and industry gifts.

Current Evaluation of Results
External scholarships exceeded $15,000, with internal awards and CMAC gifts providing additional student support. Contributions included recurring support from foundations and industry partners.

Previous Year Summary
The program sustained strong scholarship support in prior cycles. AY 2024–2025 maintained this trajectory.

Corrective Actions Taken
The program continued cultivating industry and alumni relationships to sustain scholarship growth.

Follow-up on Impact
Increased scholarship funding supported student success and retention.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None

Objective 3.1: Conduct and Publish Research

Methods of Assessment
Research activity was tracked by funded projects, publications, and presentations.

Current Evaluation of Results
Faculty secured multiple external and internal research grants, including TEXO funding for safety education exoskeleton suits and CRISys Phase IV funding. Faculty publications included peer-reviewed work in preparation and under review. Research activity continued to emphasize resilience, construction safety, and geotechnical advances.

Previous Year Summary
Faculty consistently engaged in research funding and publication across prior years. AY 2024–2025 extended this trend with expanded project themes.

Corrective Actions Taken
Faculty were encouraged to maintain interdisciplinary research collaborations and student involvement.

Follow-up on Impact
Research grants and outputs strengthened the program’s scholarly reputation and teaching-research integration.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None

Objective 3.2: Facilitate Internal and External Faculty and Staff Outreach

Methods of Assessment
Faculty service contributions were tracked at the University, College, Department, and professional levels.

Current Evaluation of Results
Faculty provided service through advising, committee memberships, task forces, and student organization sponsorships. Professional service included active involvement in journal reviewing, professional boards, and ASCE activities. Internal and external service targets were fully met.

Previous Year Summary
Faculty consistently provided high levels of service in recent years. AY 2024–2025 included expanded advisory roles and task force participation.

Corrective Actions Taken
None were required.

Follow-up on Impact
Service contributions strengthened the program’s visibility and engagement with academic and industry communities.

Revisions to Assessment Tools
None